Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#15716 - [initscripts] Reorder/changing RTC device initialization code
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi (djgera) - Wednesday, 29 July 2009, 07:04 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Monday, 09 November 2009, 09:13 GMT
Opened by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi (djgera) - Wednesday, 29 July 2009, 07:04 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Monday, 09 November 2009, 09:13 GMT
|
Details* This changes how RTC device is created at startup. Instead of doing this
manually like now (and only with rtc-cmos), leave the work for udev. * The hwclock is executed just after all devices are created (udevadm settle), and all modules are loaded. * In case of no udevd is in the system, do it manually. * For the manual step, change the code a bit to be more simple, and use only bash "read" built-in and /sys * Also change the test for detect if udev is loaded. Instead of using pidof, check if the directory /dev/.udev exists. Additional info: initscripts-2009.07-3 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Monday, 09 November 2009, 09:13 GMT
Reason for closing: Deferred
Additional comments about closing: See last comment.
Monday, 09 November 2009, 09:13 GMT
Reason for closing: Deferred
Additional comments about closing: See last comment.
0002-Reorder-changing-RTC-dev...
so an extra care should be taken here.
FS#9636. Please read. AlsoFS#9649.@Thomas, Thats is weird (udev vs time), here works fine, but only god knows...
Seems that applying it is more prone to problems for users running older kernels (Considering that Arch "support" 2.6.18)
I can change the patch, but is introducing more complexity than simplifying (this not the original idea) Comparing "cons" vs "pros"... Is rasonably to closing this.
Thanks.
FS#8665. Creating a side-effect with "make" when use /dev/null can report warnings about future timestamps.Aditional note: current udev create some initial needed devices to start like /dev/null if not exists. And maybe this will be superceded or improved by devtmpfs.