FS#15565 - [brltty] rc.d scripts request
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Zachary Kline (zkline) - Saturday, 18 July 2009, 17:19 GMT
Last edited by Giovanni Scafora (giovanni) - Sunday, 19 July 2009, 19:11 GMT
Opened by Zachary Kline (zkline) - Saturday, 18 July 2009, 17:19 GMT
Last edited by Giovanni Scafora (giovanni) - Sunday, 19 July 2009, 19:11 GMT
|
Details
Description:
Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. Steps to reproduce: Hi, It would be very much appreciated if brltty were provided with a script in /etc/rc.d. It is intended to be a daemon and thus such a script makes sense to integrate with the rest of the Arch daemon and init system. |
This task depends upon
sorry but I don't use this software, I only upgraded it to the new version.
You can find the prototype here: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=abs.git;a=blob_plain;f=prototypes/rc-script.proto;hb=HEAD
The script attached here seems to work. Note that I also created a /etc/brltty.conf file, not attached, to get this to work fully.
Best,
Zack.
I did everything in /etc/brltty.conf, which is customized for my own system.
I'd recommend other users of the package do it the same way. Incidentally, there's a sample brltty.conf file in the docs/ directory of the upstream source apparently.
Just pushed brltty-4.0-2 for i686 and x86_64.
Please, test it and let me know.
This seems to work.
I don't have any actual display hardware to use with it yet.
The tty driver does what it's supposed to though.
There's an ugly warning message in the configuration stage about tclConfig.sh.
Do we want to have yet another dependency for the sake of a tcl binding, or do we want to disable that particular configuration option?
Leaving it on doesn't prevent building, it just looks ugly to my way of thinking.
Thoughts?
Best,
Zack.
If you think that I should build brltty with these deps, I can do it.
Let me know.
My vote is leave it without: anybody who wants them can rebuild it themselves easy enough.