Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#15459 - [rox] 2.8-1 pinboard error after GTK2 upgrade

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Paco (CaptainHook8) - Thursday, 09 July 2009, 15:00 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Kieslich (tobias) - Monday, 14 September 2009, 15:47 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Tobias Kieslich (tobias)
Architecture i686
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Hi!
I have Rox 2.8-1.
I got a problem when launching rox pinboard by the command "rox -p Default" :

-----------------

(ROX-Filer:31336): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom_for_display: assertion `atom != GDK_NONE' failed
The program 'ROX-Filer' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter)'.
(Details: serial 234 error_code 5 request_code 20 minor_code 0)
(Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)

--------------------

The error is related to GTK2, I got GTK2 2.16.2-1. Previous version of GTK2 didn't give any problem with rox pinboard.

Please fix it.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Tobias Kieslich (tobias)
Monday, 14 September 2009, 15:47 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  2.10 fixed that
Comment by Paco (CaptainHook8) - Monday, 13 July 2009, 09:09 GMT
Any news about this bug?
Comment by Tobias Kieslich (tobias) - Friday, 14 August 2009, 02:52 GMT
How is 2.10 doing in this regard?
Comment by Tobias Kieslich (tobias) - Sunday, 13 September 2009, 23:06 GMT
bump? I'll close it in 2 days
Comment by Paco (CaptainHook8) - Monday, 14 September 2009, 09:46 GMT
Sorry for not answering earlier!!! Anyway everything is working fine now! :-)
Thank you very much for the fix.I appreciate that.

Paco

Loading...