Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#1544 - Plans for more LSB and FHS compliance?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Steven Van Impe (stevenvanimpe) - Tuesday, 28 September 2004, 09:19 GMT
Opened by Steven Van Impe (stevenvanimpe) - Tuesday, 28 September 2004, 09:19 GMT
|
DetailsAre there any plans to support this ?
Stuff that comes to mind are deprecating DevFS and it's name scheme (that seems to cause nothing but problems for me) in favor of udev, moving stuff away from /opt and into /usr (where apps expect to find them, this would also avoid potential bugs with these apps), adopting new stuff like /media etc |
This task depends upon
Comment by Judd Vinet (judd) -
Wednesday, 29 September 2004, 00:10 GMT
There are no immediate plans to support either. If it does happen, it'll be in the distant future, 1.0-ish.