Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#15180 - [dmapi] should be moved to [extra]
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Greg (dolby) - Saturday, 20 June 2009, 07:24 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Friday, 24 July 2009, 05:51 GMT
Opened by Greg (dolby) - Saturday, 20 June 2009, 07:24 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Friday, 24 July 2009, 05:51 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: This is part of
Dmapi is only used by xfsdump which is in extra. There is no reason to keep it in core, let alone base, if xfsdump isnt along with it. |
This task depends upon
Source? http://gentoo-portage.com/AJAX/Ebuild/85377/View clearly doesnt say so. The only runtime dependency is e2fsprogs.
Its not a dependency on Debian either: http://packages.debian.org/sid/xfsprogs
xfsprogs is the one thats a runtime dependency for dmapi, not vice versa.