Pacman

Welcome to the Pacman bug tracker. Please search the current bugs and feature requests before filing a new one! Use advanced search and select "Search in Comments".

* Please select the correct category and version.
* Write a descriptive summary, background info, and provide a reproducible test case whenever possible.
Tasklist

FS#15144 - [makepkg] improve installed dependency removal

Attached to Project: Pacman
Opened by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 17 June 2009, 08:01 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Tuesday, 11 May 2010, 22:56 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category makepkg
Status Closed
Assigned To Allan McRae (Allan)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 3.2.2
Due in Version 3.4.0
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 2
Private No

Details

Summary and Info:
When using makepkg with "-sr" and a provider package is installed, makepkg can not remove it at the end of the transaction.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Allan McRae (Allan)
Tuesday, 11 May 2010, 22:56 GMT
Reason for closing:  Implemented
Additional comments about closing:  In git: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git /commit/?id=ccbef232
Comment by Nagy Gabor (combo) - Thursday, 18 June 2009, 10:49 GMT Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Friday, 23 October 2009, 05:51 GMT Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Tuesday, 01 December 2009, 03:15 GMT
Does this make sense? Say I have a package that takes a long time to build. I have it install some deps, and then I go and install a completely unrelated package during the hour it is building. It would then get uninstalled once the package is built unless I'm reading this incorrectly.
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Tuesday, 01 December 2009, 03:22 GMT
Good point... it should be safe to move the detection of packages installed post-dep handling to directly after the dependencies are installed.
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Tuesday, 01 December 2009, 03:28 GMT
Yeah if we grab the list right after the pacman install completes, that would at least make the window for a race condition a lot shorter. I'd be much happier with that.
Comment by xduugu (xduugu) - Wednesday, 20 January 2010, 14:09 GMT

Loading...