Welcome to the Pacman bug tracker. Please search the current bugs and feature requests before filing a new one! Use advanced search and select "Search in Comments".
* Please select the correct category and version.
* Write a descriptive summary, background info, and provide a reproducible test case whenever possible.
* Please select the correct category and version.
* Write a descriptive summary, background info, and provide a reproducible test case whenever possible.
FS#15144 - [makepkg] improve installed dependency removal
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 17 June 2009, 08:01 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Tuesday, 11 May 2010, 22:56 GMT
Opened by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 17 June 2009, 08:01 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Tuesday, 11 May 2010, 22:56 GMT
|
DetailsSummary and Info:
When using makepkg with "-sr" and a provider package is installed, makepkg can not remove it at the end of the transaction. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Tuesday, 11 May 2010, 22:56 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: In git: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git /commit/?id=ccbef232
Tuesday, 11 May 2010, 22:56 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: In git: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git /commit/?id=ccbef232
Comment by Nagy Gabor (combo) -
Thursday, 18 June 2009, 10:49 GMT
See also: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-April/006143.html
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Friday, 23 October 2009, 05:51 GMT
Patch: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-October/009873.html
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) -
Tuesday, 01 December 2009, 03:15 GMT
Does this make sense? Say I have a package that takes a long time to build. I have it install some deps, and then I go and install a completely unrelated package during the hour it is building. It would then get uninstalled once the package is built unless I'm reading this incorrectly.
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Tuesday, 01 December 2009, 03:22 GMT
Good point... it should be safe to move the detection of packages installed post-dep handling to directly after the dependencies are installed.
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) -
Tuesday, 01 December 2009, 03:28 GMT
Yeah if we grab the list right after the pacman install completes, that would at least make the window for a race condition a lot shorter. I'd be much happier with that.
Comment by xduugu (xduugu) -
Wednesday, 20 January 2010, 14:09 GMT
Latest patch: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-December/010239.html