Release Engineering

Tasklist

FS#14423 - Installer partitions information

Attached to Project: Release Engineering
Opened by Mihai Militaru (akephalos) - Wednesday, 22 April 2009, 06:23 GMT
Last edited by Dieter Plaetinck (Dieter_be) - Thursday, 25 June 2009, 17:19 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category archlinux-installer (deprecate
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2009.02
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

The installer, at the point of mounting partitions, won't inform the user of any of their properties. The list could better contain, besides the device names, at least the size and current filesystem type, if not label and UUID, too. Some partitions can change the device order (in different configurations, usb drives, etc), the user would be stucked in trying to guess them.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Dieter Plaetinck (Dieter_be)
Thursday, 25 June 2009, 17:19 GMT
Reason for closing:  Won't fix
Additional comments about closing:  archlinux-installer is deprecated.
AIF does this well.
Comment by Dieter Plaetinck (Dieter_be) - Wednesday, 24 June 2009, 19:14 GMT
Be more specific.
- are you talking about aif or archlinux-installer?
- autoprepare or custom?

This is how it looks in aif, which looks quite okay I think:
http://users.edpnet.be/dieter/aif/aif-alpha_0.6-disks-overview-dia.png

autoprepare is obviously simpler by design.
Comment by Mihai Militaru (akephalos) - Thursday, 25 June 2009, 12:53 GMT
It is about the Arch Linux default installer, on the official download image.
Yes, I've used custom partition setup, my request applies to the case when the user needs to correctly identify previously created partitions containing precious data, before choosing mount points and installing. Also, it applies to an offline installation from scratch using the live image and running /arch/setup, not a special setup which enables the user to download custom installers.

That screenshot looks to be exactly what I was requesting (except UUID which, for the sake of simplicity, turns out to be a bad idea).
Comment by Dieter Plaetinck (Dieter_be) - Thursday, 25 June 2009, 17:18 GMT
Ok, thanks for the clarification

Loading...