FS#14032 - gnome 2.26 install

Attached to Project: Pacman
Opened by Matthias Hartner (matsche) - Monday, 30 March 2009, 16:55 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Monday, 30 March 2009, 18:58 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category General
Status Closed
Assigned To Dan McGee (toofishes)
Architecture All
Severity High
Priority Normal
Reported Version 3.2.2
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
(12/72) Aktualisiere gcalctool [#####################] 100%
WARNUNG: the <gettext_domain>-Element under <schema> wasn't able to interprete
( 9/72) Aktualisiere evince [#####################] 100%
WARNUNG: the <gettext_domain>-element under <schema> wasn*t able to interprete


Additional info:
* package version(s): New gnome 2.26 testing update from 2.24.3
* config and/or log files etc.: latest testing stuff


Steps to reproduce:
pacman -Syu in testing
This task depends upon

Closed by  Jan de Groot (JGC)
Monday, 30 March 2009, 18:58 GMT
Reason for closing:  Not a bug
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Monday, 30 March 2009, 17:20 GMT
the gettext_domain option needs gconf 2.26.0-2 to install these schemas correctly. gconf>=2.26.0-2 is a dependency for gcalctool, so something went wrong on your system. Can you attach your pacman.log?
Comment by Matthias Hartner (matsche) - Monday, 30 March 2009, 17:49 GMT
sure
   pacman.log (305.3 KiB)
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Monday, 30 March 2009, 18:28 GMT
Looks like pacman is installing all this stuff in alphabetical order. I didn't specify these dependencies for nothing, so this is a pacman bug.
Comment by Matthias Hartner (matsche) - Monday, 30 March 2009, 18:37 GMT
0:30:21 matze@~ $ nautilus
nautilus: error while loading shared libraries: libunique-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

so i needed pacman -S libunique

I looks like this is a missing dependency! :-)
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Monday, 30 March 2009, 18:41 GMT
I don't know what you did, but libunique is a dependency of nautilus. This starts to make sense to me: did you upgrade using the -d flag?
In case of the -d flag, pacman only installs updates and no new dependencies. As dependencies aren't checked, the order of package installation isn't maintained either.
Comment by Matthias Hartner (matsche) - Monday, 30 March 2009, 18:55 GMT
you're right. close this bug. i*m s****d...

Loading...