Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#13985 - [handbrake] 0.9.3-1 is not version 0.9.3

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Michael Laß (Bevan) - Friday, 27 March 2009, 14:42 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Monday, 28 September 2009, 04:26 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Eric Belanger (Snowman)
James Rayner (iphitus)
Architecture i686
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description:

When you install the binary package handbrake-0.9.3-1 you get version 0.9.1 instead:
bash-3.2$ handbrake -u
HandBrake 0.9.1 (2007100800) - http://handbrake.m0k.org/
In this version some really nice features are missing (e.g. profiles).

When you build it manually via abs you get an SVN version instead:
bash-3.2$ handbrake -u
HandBrake svnexportiert (2009032701) - http://handbrake.fr/

I am using Arch on i686, all packages are up to date.
Please report if you are needing further information.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Monday, 28 September 2009, 04:26 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  fixed in handbrake-0.9.3-2
Comment by Ralf Barth (Haggy) - Thursday, 18 June 2009, 18:59 GMT
I confirm this - 0.93 is 0.91
Comment by Michael Laß (Bevan) - Saturday, 18 July 2009, 12:44 GMT
On x86_64 you get an up to date version:

handbrake -u:
HandBrake svnesportato (2009030201) - http://handbrake.fr/

Features of version 0.9.3 are included.
Comment by Ralf Barth (Haggy) - Saturday, 18 July 2009, 16:40 GMT
Is there anyone working on this? Come on it's 4 months old and no one is able to just package it again and push a rev?
Comment by Michael Laß (Bevan) - Friday, 25 September 2009, 19:02 GMT
I sent an email to James Rayner nearly 8 weeks ago but didn't get an answer. Is this package unmaintained? Then it maybe should removed out of extra...
Comment by James Rayner (iphitus) - Sunday, 27 September 2009, 01:43 GMT
thought I had done this, building now.

Loading...