Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#138 - bin86
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by john lowell (johnlowell) - Tuesday, 19 August 2003, 21:24 GMT
Last edited by Judd Vinet (judd) - Friday, 05 September 2003, 17:26 GMT
Opened by john lowell (johnlowell) - Tuesday, 19 August 2003, 21:24 GMT
Last edited by Judd Vinet (judd) - Friday, 05 September 2003, 17:26 GMT
|
DetailsDoing a source build of bin86last night, I could not download the code. Some research indicates that the source for the version we use in abs, 0.16.11-1, is not available at their download site at this time. Unless I'm reading things wrong the successor version source, 0.16.12, is available, however. It would be my guess from the appearance of things that the time for sourcecode for 0.16.11.1 is now a thing of the past. See: http://www.cix.co.uk/~mayday/dev86/
Should we move to .12? |
This task depends upon
Closed by Anonymous Submitter
Friday, 05 September 2003, 17:26 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Friday, 05 September 2003, 17:26 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Comment by Judd Vinet (judd) -
Friday, 05 September 2003, 17:26 GMT
- Task details edited
Fixed in 0.16.12-1