Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#13542 - monodevelop source is unavailable

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Greg (dolby) - Thursday, 26 February 2009, 11:37 GMT
Last edited by Timm (gummibaerchen) - Thursday, 26 February 2009, 14:49 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category
Status Closed
Assigned To Timm (gummibaerchen)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

monodevelop source is unavailable
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8071
This task depends upon

Closed by  Timm (gummibaerchen)
Thursday, 26 February 2009, 14:49 GMT
Reason for closing:  Won't fix
Additional comments about closing:  Snapshots aren't saved and I can not mirror the sources in "arch's name", so this won't fix until MD 2.0.
Comment by Timm (gummibaerchen) - Thursday, 26 February 2009, 14:22 GMT
Yes. It build from snapshots, which aren't saved on the server. So every 24h the Snapshot has a new number.

Do I have to mirror the snapshot somewhere, or can this be a WONTFIX until MD 2.0 is released?

Most of the new code seems to be not GPL anymore anyway, so we don't have to mirror that. I will review the situation again (regarding the licenses).
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Thursday, 26 February 2009, 14:31 GMT
Well you are the developer, as long as theres no way to fix it, just close it. I just went through most packages and reported the ones i had problems downloading.
Maybe there could be a place like the other/ dir in ftp.archlinux.org where sources can be uploaded for TUs and ABS can work? Just an idea, but if theres many more packages like that it would be nice.
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Thursday, 26 February 2009, 14:33 GMT
s/developer/maintainer
Comment by Timm (gummibaerchen) - Thursday, 26 February 2009, 14:46 GMT
Well, I think these are really corner-cases.

But I think for GPLs sake "Arch Linux" has to provide a copy of the source anyway, don't they?
Comment by Timm (gummibaerchen) - Thursday, 26 February 2009, 14:47 GMT
See here: ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/sources/

So probably when we switch to devtools with [community], that will work for us as well.

Loading...