Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#13488 - [coreutils-7.1] Outdated patches (enable-pam isn't recognized)
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi (djgera) - Wednesday, 25 February 2009, 18:02 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Thursday, 26 February 2009, 04:46 GMT
Opened by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi (djgera) - Wednesday, 25 February 2009, 18:02 GMT
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Thursday, 26 February 2009, 04:46 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Seems that the patches apply, but with warnings about offsets, and when configure runs this warning appears configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-pam Steps to reproduce: cp -a /var/abs/testing/coreutils coreutils cd coreutils # need to edit PKGBUILD because missing install file? makepkg |
This task depends upon
Closed by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Thursday, 26 February 2009, 04:46 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in trunk.
Thursday, 26 February 2009, 04:46 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in trunk.
FS#13444(missing setuid su)tar xf coreutils-7.1.tar.gz
cp -a coreutils-7.1 coreutils-7.1.orig
for x in coreutils*.patch; do
NOMBRE=$(basename $x .patch)
patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 -i ../$x -d coreutils-7.1
diff -Naru coreutils-7.1.orig coreutils-7.1 > ${NOMBRE}.FIXED.patch
patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 -R -i ../$x -d coreutils-7.1
done
* autoconf isn't needed, it's already called by autoreconf a few lines above
* all patches are at latest "upstream" state from Fedora and Gentoo. I don't care if there are some offsets. Feel free to contact the Gentoo/Fedora maintainers.
So this in all isn't a bug.
Question: Running autoreconf (like now) but after apliying all patches, not is a better idea? This resolves the "redundant" warning.
Thanks.
what's wrong with su compiled with pam? what would be the difference if we don't do that? (same md5sum - hum?)
It happened that I saw that warning several times, when I tried compiling, and then report the problem for sure.