Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#13242 - Package with multiple license are displayed incorrectly on website
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Thursday, 12 February 2009, 13:46 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Saturday, 26 September 2009, 14:50 GMT
Opened by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Thursday, 12 February 2009, 13:46 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Saturday, 26 September 2009, 14:50 GMT
|
DetailsWhen a package has multiple licenses, the licenses are displayed without any spaces between them. e.g.:
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/xine-lib/ License: LGPLGPL |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan McGee (toofishes)
Saturday, 26 September 2009, 14:50 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Won't necessarily update existing packages, but as they get updated things should work.
Saturday, 26 September 2009, 14:50 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: Won't necessarily update existing packages, but as they get updated things should work.
Comment by Eric Belanger (Snowman) -
Monday, 16 February 2009, 20:00 GMT
BTW, sometime no license is displayed even if the package as one, eg. net-snmp
Comment by Thayer Williams (thayer) -
Sunday, 01 March 2009, 07:35 GMT
Not sure how this one got assigned to me...isn't this a pacman/makepkg development issue?
Comment by Greg (dolby) -
Sunday, 01 March 2009, 08:10 GMT
Its only relevant to the way licenses are displayed on the website. Probably Dusty is more approooriate to assign it to.
Comment by Thayer Williams (thayer) -
Sunday, 01 March 2009, 17:43 GMT
Haha duh! Sorry, that's what I get for doing dev stuff at midnight after a long week. I'll take a look at the code.