Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#13094 - kde 4.2: plasma memory leakage

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by CT (ctHx) - Monday, 02 February 2009, 14:04 GMT
Last edited by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Friday, 27 February 2009, 15:31 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Pierre Schmitz (Pierre)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version None
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description:
memory usage of plasma grows
(15->600mb +, maybe more i have reboot)

Additional info:
* package version(s)
kdebase 4.2.0-1
kdebase-runtime 4.2.0-2
kdebase-workspace 4.2.0-2

* config and/or log files etc.


Steps to reproduce:
use kde 4.2 %)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Pierre Schmitz (Pierre)
Friday, 27 February 2009, 15:31 GMT
Reason for closing:  Upstream
Additional comments about closing:  There is nothing I could do about this. You should report it to the KDE devs if this is still a problem.
Comment by Ronald van Haren (pressh) - Tuesday, 03 February 2009, 14:48 GMT
maybe one of the widgets the user is using, I don't have such memory leak. CT, what widgets do you use? Can you find out if any in particular is using it or that it is plasma in general?
Comment by CT (ctHx) - Tuesday, 03 February 2009, 15:42 GMT
this leak informations is about few days without reboot.
maximum speed leakage is with copy information in tray (stupid feature, how to swith is off?)
Comment by CT (ctHx) - Tuesday, 03 February 2009, 17:51 GMT
about widgets: 4 panels, digital clock, tray, desktop switcher,taskbar,classical menu launcher, some icons

Comment by CT (ctHx) - Sunday, 08 February 2009, 22:16 GMT
i use x86_64,maybe it is platform-specific?
Comment by CT (ctHx) - Monday, 16 February 2009, 11:13 GMT
%)

Loading...