Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#12660 - Web Site URL change

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Scott Robbins (scottro111) - Sunday, 04 January 2009, 02:49 GMT
Last edited by Thayer Williams (thayer) - Sunday, 31 May 2009, 22:24 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Web Sites
Status Closed
Assigned To Thayer Williams (thayer)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version None
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:Site link in "Press" section has changed.


Additional info:
I have a very old article on Arch, from 2004, that is still listed in the Press section. Whether anyone bothers to look at it or not, I don't know, but the link has changed.
If you do wish to leave it in there, the new URL is http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/arch.html

Thanks.



* package version(s)
* config and/or log files etc.


Steps to reproduce:
This task depends upon

Closed by  Thayer Williams (thayer)
Sunday, 31 May 2009, 22:24 GMT
Reason for closing:  Implemented
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Sunday, 04 January 2009, 23:56 GMT
I would recommend not having a press link at all. No offense to the reporter. There is no way to track down changes in all those articles. Maybe a link to the distrowatch Archlinux page would be more suitable, as they have links to reviews.
Comment by Scott Robbins (scottro111) - Wednesday, 11 February 2009, 18:43 GMT
Not at all offended. It's an ancient article, as I've said. Way way back when written (around 0.3, updated somewhat for 0.4) it was in the documentation section, but as the documentation became better and better it was moved to reviews. I'm happy with the link being removed completely.

I apologize for not getting back to you before this, to be honest, I'd more or less forgotten about it.

Thanks.
Comment by Scott Robbins (scottro111) - Tuesday, 17 February 2009, 20:21 GMT
Ok, I see the link was removed from the ArchLinux page which is fine. (However, it was moved to the Who's Talking About Arch list. The article's so old that I doubt anyone would bother (the date is listed, it's from 2004), but perhaps it's best to either fix or simply remove it. Either way is fine with me.

Thanks, and I do realize that this is an extremely low priority request.

Loading...