Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#12581 - Would like to use firefox with spellcheckers other than hunspell

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Peter Simons (peti) - Friday, 26 December 2008, 13:36 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Friday, 26 December 2008, 16:41 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version None
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

The xulrunner package depends on hunspell. I prefer to use aspell, however, not least of all because it seems to be much better supported. Would it be possible to change the PKGBUILD so that the to-be-used spellchecker can be configured? I realize that I can edit the PKGBUILD and just compile everything myself, but it would be nice if I wouldn't have to.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Jan de Groot (JGC)
Friday, 26 December 2008, 16:41 GMT
Reason for closing:  Not a bug
Comment by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Friday, 26 December 2008, 14:08 GMT
Mozilla uses hunspell as spelling backend since the gecko 1.9 engine, I don't think we can change that. If there would be any possibility to change the engine, I would go for enchant, nothing else.
Comment by Peter Simons (peti) - Friday, 26 December 2008, 16:25 GMT
My understanding is that enchant supports aspell as a back-end, so I'd be perfectly happy with that solution. Whether it's possible to configure that or not, I'm not qualified to say.

Loading...