FS#12431 - Cannot upgrade/install extra/ettercap-gtk NG_0.7.3-4

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by hyperb0lix (hyperb0lix) - Friday, 12 December 2008, 19:48 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Friday, 19 December 2008, 10:49 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Hugo Doria (hdoria)
Architecture All
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version None
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 2
Private No

Details

Description:

extra/ettercap-gtk NG_0.7.3-4 cannot be upgraded/installed, for it depends on an older version of extra/ettercap (NG_0.7.3-10). Only NG_0.7.3-11 is in extra.

Additional info:

* package version(s)
extra/ettercap-gtk NG_0.7.3-4

* config and/or log files etc.
See below.

Steps to reproduce:

[~] pacman -Ss ettercap
extra/ettercap NG_0.7.3-11
A network sniffer/interceptor/logger for ethernet LANs - console
extra/ettercap-gtk NG_0.7.3-4
A network sniffer/interceptor/logger for ethernet LANs - GTK
[~] pacman -S ettercap-gtk
resolving dependencies...
error: cannot resolve "ettercap=NG_0.7.3-10", a dependency of "ettercap-gtk"
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: ettercap-gtk: requires ettercap=NG_0.7.3-10
This task depends upon

Closed by  Allan McRae (Allan)
Friday, 19 December 2008, 10:49 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Jozef Mares (kain) - Friday, 12 December 2008, 21:45 GMT
agree, my pacman log:

:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: obex-data-server: local (0.3.1-1) is newer than extra (0.3-3)
warning: wireshark: ignoring package upgrade (1.0.4-1 => 1.0.4-3)
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: ettercap-gtk: requires ettercap=NG_0.7.3-10

In extra, there is:
extra/ettercap NG_0.7.3-11
A network sniffer/interceptor/logger for ethernet LANs - console
Comment by tntcoda (tntcoda) - Saturday, 13 December 2008, 00:51 GMT
Confirmed again, same problem here.
Comment by hyperb0lix (hyperb0lix) - Sunday, 14 December 2008, 21:39 GMT
The problem has been fixed. Thanks!

Loading...