Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#12367 - pacman can't find an existing community package
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by Leandro Chescotta (leo2501) - Saturday, 06 December 2008, 20:55 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Tuesday, 14 April 2009, 10:44 GMT
Opened by Leandro Chescotta (leo2501) - Saturday, 06 December 2008, 20:55 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Tuesday, 14 April 2009, 10:44 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
the community package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8272 doesn't appear in a "pacman -Ss poweriso" and neither install it Additional info: * poweriso 1.3-1 * the package exists here http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8272 Steps to reproduce: 1. pacman -Ss poweriso |
This task depends upon
Closed by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh)
Tuesday, 14 April 2009, 10:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed by ghost1227
Tuesday, 14 April 2009, 10:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed by ghost1227
Comment by Ronald van Haren (pressh) -
Saturday, 06 December 2008, 23:24 GMT
is this an i686 binary blob?
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Sunday, 07 December 2008, 01:37 GMT
It just has not been built for x86_64 yet. If you are using i686, make sure you have done a "pacman -Sy" or even "pacman -Syy"
Comment by Leandro Chescotta (leo2501) -
Sunday, 07 December 2008, 03:36 GMT
I noticed the bug in a x86_64 arch, but installing it with the PKGBUILD from cvs results in a full working installation of poweriso, just like before my fresh install of x86_64 (before i was using i686)
Comment by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) -
Thursday, 02 April 2009, 15:38 GMT
Has this been fixed?
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Thursday, 02 April 2009, 15:48 GMT
no: http://www.archlinux.de/?page=ArchitectureDifferences