FS#12361 - sata_nv ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by saro (0s4r) - Saturday, 06 December 2008, 13:43 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Friday, 13 February 2009, 09:42 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Kernel
Status Closed
Assigned To Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Thomas Bächler (brain0)
Architecture i686
Severity High
Priority Normal
Reported Version None
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

Description:
When using kernel 2.6.27.7-1, the hdd sata doesn't work and is not possible to use the sata_nv.patch because it's in conflict with the arch patch.

This is the patch that i use in the kernel26-2.6.27.6.
it's ok.
http://rafb.net/p/AcSySi87.html

The kernel.log is in the attach file.
   kernel.log (267.7 KiB)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Friday, 13 February 2009, 09:42 GMT
Reason for closing:  Implemented
Additional comments about closing:  2.6.28.5
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Sunday, 07 December 2008, 12:59 GMT Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Sunday, 07 December 2008, 13:00 GMT
You patch only differs in nv_reset part please report it upstream, .28 kernel also doesn't contain more fixes then this.
Comment by saro (0s4r) - Tuesday, 09 December 2008, 11:41 GMT
i have report it to bugzilla.kernel.org, this is the report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12176
Comment by Glenn Matthys (RedShift) - Thursday, 18 December 2008, 08:37 GMT
What's the status of this issue? This link (http://rafb.net/p/AcSySi87.html) is gone.
Comment by Glenn Matthys (RedShift) - Sunday, 28 December 2008, 05:56 GMT
  • Field changed: Status (Assigned → Waiting on Response)
Do you (the reporter) still have problems with your nvidia SATA controller with kernel 2.6.28 from testing? I myself have a system with a sata_nv controller and can't reproduce the problem you are having.
Comment by saro (0s4r) - Sunday, 28 December 2008, 14:17 GMT
yes, the kernel 2.6.28 don't work.

this is the output

Comment by saro (0s4r) - Thursday, 01 January 2009, 17:06 GMT
no solution?
Comment by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Tuesday, 06 January 2009, 08:21 GMT
well upstream rejects it because it's incorporated, we use latest upstream. Soemthing seems to be wrong here on here.
Comment by saro (0s4r) - Thursday, 12 February 2009, 10:35 GMT
The problem is fixed with the patch of Tejun Heo.
Read thid bug report http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12176.

Loading...