Community Packages

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#12305 - missing deps in qgis

Attached to Project: Community Packages
Opened by Maciej Libuda (Mefju) - Monday, 01 December 2008, 13:31 GMT
Last edited by dtw (dibblethewrecker) - Monday, 09 March 2009, 18:04 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category
Status Closed
Assigned To dtw (dibblethewrecker)
Architecture x86_64
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
qgis has missing depedencies. It won't build when unixodbc and xerces-c are not installed. It breaks at source configuration level. I'm using qgis with grass support.


Additional info:
qgis-0.11.0-2
This task depends upon

Closed by  dtw (dibblethewrecker)
Monday, 09 March 2009, 18:04 GMT
Reason for closing:  Won't fix
Additional comments about closing:  Package updated.

The updated pkg builds perfectly (as far as I can tell) in a clean chroot, so all deps should be fine.

I have never even associated unixodbc and xerces-c with qgis and I am not sure if I have ever installed them.

If the problem persists please post a new bug.

Comment by David Campbell (Davekong) - Wednesday, 07 January 2009, 11:33 GMT
I was able to build, but when trying to run the application got the following error:

qgis: error while loading shared libraries: libodbc.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

There is source for a new version 1.0.0 out (20 Dec 2008), although there was not a news release about it yet. so maybe this bug should be closed? Should I try to compile the new version myself and post to AUR?
Comment by David Campbell (Davekong) - Thursday, 08 January 2009, 14:35 GMT
I asked around irc several times to try to better understand the out of date package status.I don't know if whoever marked the package out of date did so correctly. Source for 1.0.0 is out but is considered "Preview", not final yet. Chances are though if this bug is not really supposed to be closed, it will be soon.

Loading...