Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#12205 - openal in arch is ancient
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Leon Vayman (vleon) - Saturday, 22 November 2008, 09:12 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Sunday, 15 March 2009, 08:28 GMT
Opened by Leon Vayman (vleon) - Saturday, 22 November 2008, 09:12 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Sunday, 15 March 2009, 08:28 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Usually its not a problem even for a rolling release to have som package out of date, but openal in arch is just ancient and the reason is that openal for linux moved to another code base (openal-soft) for quite a while ago. Altough as far as i know in arch official and community repos there is no app that strictly requires openal-soft, there are apps in the net that do, one of them is fife-svn in aur: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20564 and in any case unless someone knows better an updated version should have new and better features that the old one doesnt have. With the help of Jonathan Frazier (wideeye in the arch chat) we created an openal-soft package (he created most of it and i modified it a bit, tested and uploaded to aur), i used this package succesfully with fife itself and many openaal, and freealut games and it work perfectly. My suggestion is that some dev will grab our package, test/modify it and throw it to testing for now, later on to replace openal. The package in aur: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21310 |
This task depends upon
It seems the openAL page links to the new OpenAL-soft project for its downloads already, so I think it would be good to replace OpenAL with OpenAL-soft in a short while.
fife-svn was looking for.
if its wrong can you please tell me why and how to fix it (so that i dont repeat the mistakes in another package)
so you are saying a patch should be submited to fife?