Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#12183 - Some sort of automatic pacnew merging
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by JD (jdhore) - Wednesday, 19 November 2008, 19:02 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Sunday, 23 November 2008, 05:35 GMT
Opened by JD (jdhore) - Wednesday, 19 November 2008, 19:02 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Sunday, 23 November 2008, 05:35 GMT
|
DetailsI believe handling of .pacnew files should be handled automatically. I recently had a problem with dhcpcd failing on boot and it turns out there was a .pacnew file for it in /etc/conf.d/ that had the fix which i totally forgot was there...So i have 2 proposals:
1. Include a .pacold file with packages when a conf file changes (or requires a .pacnew), if the old config file (say dhcpcd.conf) matches the .pacold (dhcpcd.conf.pacold), meaning the user hasn't changed it, remove the old dhcpcd.conf, remove the .pacold file and automatically rename dhcpcd.conf.pacnew to dhcpcd.conf so people who don't change some of their .conf files don't have to deal with it. 2. When a .pacnew comes in on a package upgrade, do what debian does and throw up a menu asking: 1. Look at the difference between the 2 files (uses diff -u old.file new.file > less and dumps back to this menu on exiting less), 2. replace current with $file.pacnew, 3. keep current, remove $file.pacnew, 4. edit $file.pacnew and replace current with it. I think one of these outcomes would make it much easier for new users and people who don't edit all their .conf files alike to have fewer issues. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Dan McGee (toofishes)
Sunday, 23 November 2008, 05:35 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: See comments.
Sunday, 23 November 2008, 05:35 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: See comments.
I'm sure you could write a wrapper script to do exactly what you are saying.