Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#12155 - libsasl and .la files?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Jim Pryor (Profjim) - Monday, 17 November 2008, 05:03 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Monday, 17 November 2008, 07:41 GMT
Opened by Jim Pryor (Profjim) - Monday, 17 November 2008, 05:03 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Monday, 17 November 2008, 07:41 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: At least on i686, libsasl installs four .la files. If they are not needed, shouldn't they be slayed? If they are needed, shouldn't the PKGBUILD specify options=(libtool...) in case the user has changed the /etc/makepkg.conf default to !libtool?
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Jan de Groot (JGC)
Monday, 17 November 2008, 07:41 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: Changing the defaults to !libtool is stupid because it breaks too many things. sasl is a library that needs .la files for the plugins.
Monday, 17 November 2008, 07:41 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: Changing the defaults to !libtool is stupid because it breaks too many things. sasl is a library that needs .la files for the plugins.