Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#12153 - libvorbis and .la files?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Jim Pryor (Profjim) - Monday, 17 November 2008, 04:57 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Sunday, 15 February 2009, 00:04 GMT
Opened by Jim Pryor (Profjim) - Monday, 17 November 2008, 04:57 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Sunday, 15 February 2009, 00:04 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: On i686, libvorbis installs three .la files. Its PKGBUILD doesn't specify options=(libtool). I'm told these files aren't installed on x86_64. If they're not needed, shouldn't they be removed? If they are needed, shouldn't the PKGBUILD specify options=(libtool...), in case the user changes the /etc/makepkg.conf default to !libtool?
|
This task depends upon
Closed by Jan de Groot (JGC)
Sunday, 15 February 2009, 00:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: The .la files are removed in 1.2.1rc1-2. I pushed it into testing because I have no overview of what .la files are including this one yet.
Sunday, 15 February 2009, 00:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: The .la files are removed in 1.2.1rc1-2. I pushed it into testing because I have no overview of what .la files are including this one yet.
[jan@jan ~]$
Hmm, this was on x86_64... it's weird to see any difference between architectures, as both are built from the same PKGBUILD.
libvorbis /usr/lib/libvorbis.la
libvorbis /usr/lib/libvorbisenc.la
libvorbis /usr/lib/libvorbisfile.la