Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#12137 - Gnash should be compiled against AGG, not OpenGL
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by name withheld (Gullible Jones) - Saturday, 15 November 2008, 20:58 GMT
Last edited by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Friday, 05 December 2008, 04:41 GMT
Opened by name withheld (Gullible Jones) - Saturday, 15 November 2008, 20:58 GMT
Last edited by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) - Friday, 05 December 2008, 04:41 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Gnash/OpenGL performance is wholly abominable, delivering one or two frames per second at best on machines with perfectly adequate video hardware. To fix this, Gnash should instead be compiled to use Antigrain, which is less buggy and known to work fine on most machines. Additional info: * gnash-common 0.8.4-1 Steps to reproduce: Install Gnash and attempt to view any Flash banner or other animation. I can guarantee that you will get ~1 frame per second. |
This task depends upon
Comment by name withheld (Gullible Jones) -
Sunday, 16 November 2008, 03:31 GMT
Uh oh... It looks like the Gnash packages are orphaned on both architectures. Is there anyone available to maintain them?
Comment by Pierre Schmitz (Pierre) -
Friday, 05 December 2008, 04:41 GMT
OGL is the upstream default renderer and is working better for me than agg. If this is different for you there is something wrong with your hardware or drivers.