Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#1193 - pacman proxy port defaults to 0
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Kevin Piche (kpiche) - Monday, 26 July 2004, 18:01 GMT
Last edited by Judd Vinet (judd) - Tuesday, 27 July 2004, 16:01 GMT
Opened by Kevin Piche (kpiche) - Monday, 26 July 2004, 18:01 GMT
Last edited by Judd Vinet (judd) - Tuesday, 27 July 2004, 16:01 GMT
|
DetailsBug in pacman 2.8.2-1 where if pacman.conf contains:
ProxyHost = server and no ProxyPort is provided it will try to connect to 'server:0'. Error is in pacsync.c and appears to be a cut and paste error. Patch { --- src/pacsync.c.orig 2004-07-26 12:46:38.000000000 -0400 +++ src/pacsync.c 2004-07-26 12:48:19.000000000 -0400 @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ char *host; unsigned port; host = (pmo_proxyhost) ? pmo_proxyhost : server->server; - port = (pmo_proxyhost) ? pmo_proxyport : 80; + port = (pmo_proxyport) ? pmo_proxyport : 80; if(strchr(host, ':')) { vprint("Connecting to %s\n", host); } else { } The tabs have been mangled in the patch above, but it's just a variable change. 
p282-defaultproxyport.patch
|
This task depends upon
Blank lines don't affect me as badly, but they can still keep me up at night. It's mostly a sinus thing, but the doctors say that I shouldn't aggravate it any further, and just avoid blank lines as I do with comments.
But is that really any of your business? Please don't pry into my personal medical problems.