Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#11599 - pam_unix2
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by A. K. (Misery) - Saturday, 27 September 2008, 15:54 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Saturday, 27 September 2008, 19:05 GMT
Opened by A. K. (Misery) - Saturday, 27 September 2008, 15:54 GMT
Last edited by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa) - Saturday, 27 September 2008, 19:05 GMT
|
DetailsThe package pam uses the updated version 2.1 of "pam_unix2" and 2.6 is available.
Is there a reason to use this old version? ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kukuk/pam/pam_unix2/pam_unix2-2.6.tar.bz2 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa)
Saturday, 27 September 2008, 19:05 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: pam-1.0.2-2
Saturday, 27 September 2008, 19:05 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: pam-1.0.2-2
Comment by A. K. (Misery) -
Saturday, 27 September 2008, 15:57 GMT
oh, I mean the updated pam package uses an outdated pam_unix2 tarball. :-)