FS#11513 - slim with pam support, otherwise jack-audio-connection-kit and such fails to start with realtime opt
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Joshua Newth (yosh64) - Thursday, 18 September 2008, 00:14 GMT
Last edited by Alexander Fehr (pizzapunk) - Friday, 12 December 2008, 01:09 GMT
Opened by Joshua Newth (yosh64) - Thursday, 18 September 2008, 00:14 GMT
Last edited by Alexander Fehr (pizzapunk) - Friday, 12 December 2008, 01:09 GMT
|
Details
Description:
I just wanted to let ya know that ya should build slim with pam support, otherwise ya can't use jack-audio-connection-kit and such. Anyhows I made a new PKGBUILD, had to make a patch for it to build (just had to #include <cstdlib> in cfg.cpp), and to build with pam support I done <make USE_PAM=1>, and finally I made a slim.pam file with "session required pam_limits.so" that installs to "/etc/pam.d/slim". I haven't put this on the AUR yet, there already seems to be a slim-pam on there that is orphaned. But yea, I didn't use this and actually just downloaded and modified the official PKGBUILD and such from http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/slim/repos/extra-x86_64/. Additional info: * package version(s) * config and/or log files etc. extra/slim 1.3.0-2 extra/jack-audio-connection-kit 0.109.2-2 As I've already resolved the issue I don't have a complete log, but it was something like "cannot use real-time scheduling (FIFO at priority 10)", and continued on failing to start. Steps to reproduce: Install default slim 1.3.0-2 and jack-audio-connection-kit 0.109.2-2 packages, login with slim and then try <jackd -R -d alsa>. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Alexander Fehr (pizzapunk)
Friday, 12 December 2008, 01:09 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: slim 1.3.1-1
Friday, 12 December 2008, 01:09 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: slim 1.3.1-1
Comment by
Matthew Wesley (AlecTavi) -
Saturday, 18 October 2008, 20:26 GMT
Comment by schischa (schischa) -
Thursday, 30 October 2008, 21:50 GMT
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) -
Sunday, 16 November 2008, 17:58 GMT
I'd like to second the slim with PAM support request. For any
non-passwd based login, it is required.
PAM support would be really nice. otherwise you can't use
fingerprint sensors with slim.
This is becoming particularly important now as
policykit/consolekit requires PAM authentication. The slim-pam
package from the AUR works fine although by default I would not
include the gnome-keyring lines in the /etc/pam.d/slim file.