Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#11487 - Mistake in the modprobe(8) and modprobe.conf(5) manpages
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Carlo Bersani (carlocci) - Sunday, 14 September 2008, 23:17 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Saturday, 18 October 2008, 15:04 GMT
Opened by Carlo Bersani (carlocci) - Sunday, 14 September 2008, 23:17 GMT
Last edited by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Saturday, 18 October 2008, 15:04 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
Both the manpages says that modprobe.d is considered only if modprobe.conf doesn't exist, which is false. This blows my mind away: I don't know if I will ever trust a man again. man 5 modprobe.conf: /etc/modprobe.conf (or, if that does not exist, all files under the /etc/modprobe.d directory) specifies those options, as required. man 8 modprobe: -C --config This option overrides the default configuration file (/etc/modprobe.conf or /etc/modprobe.d/ if that isn't found). Additional info: both manpages are in module-init-tools-3.4-1 Steps to reproduce: man 5 modprobe.conf man 8 modprobe |
This task depends upon
Closed by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka)
Saturday, 18 October 2008, 15:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: closing it; if the author doesn't respond ever, I think the best way would be to raise this issue on LKML.
Saturday, 18 October 2008, 15:04 GMT
Reason for closing: Upstream
Additional comments about closing: closing it; if the author doesn't respond ever, I think the best way would be to raise this issue on LKML.
Please report this to module-init-tools developers.
@Aaron: should we keep this bug open just to keep track on its status?
I will try the email route.
If the bugzilla does not work, I'd suggest emailing Jon Masters directly (see main page above).
Roman, I think we should close this
The more I witness different bug reporting systems, the more I come to appreciate emails and flyspray.
interestingly, while reading this patch: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/module-init-tools-3.4-manpages-1.patch
(which is incorrect too) it looks like manpages are generated from docbook files so distros are providing pre-generated manpages to avoid docbook2man :)
Thanks for clearing that out, that was interesting