Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#11113 - useless file in gnuplot package
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by jiyunatori (jiyunatori) - Monday, 04 August 2008, 14:00 GMT
Last edited by Ronald van Haren (pressh) - Monday, 02 February 2009, 08:08 GMT
Opened by jiyunatori (jiyunatori) - Monday, 04 August 2008, 14:00 GMT
Last edited by Ronald van Haren (pressh) - Monday, 02 February 2009, 08:08 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: the gnuplot package installs the following file :
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/dotemacs however, the choice has been made by the maintainer not to install the emacs gnuplot-mode which comes with the tarball. Therefore, I don't see the point of installing a file containing informations about something that isn't installed. I'd rather suggest a message at install time giving a hint on the gnuplot-mode package present in the AUR. ----- package version : 4.2.3-1 |
This task depends upon
Closed by Ronald van Haren (pressh)
Monday, 02 February 2009, 08:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: gnuplot has been build with emacs support since version 4.2.4-1 back in October 2008 so the file is relevant now
Monday, 02 February 2009, 08:08 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: gnuplot has been build with emacs support since version 4.2.4-1 back in October 2008 so the file is relevant now
Comment by Greg (dolby) -
Monday, 04 August 2008, 17:00 GMT
- Field changed: Status (Unconfirmed → Assigned)
- Task assigned to Damir Perisa (damir.perisa)
Too much fuzz about 1 file. Also IMO a post install msg for something that meaningless? No thanks.
Comment by Eric Belanger (Snowman) -
Monday, 04 August 2008, 17:58 GMT
Plus that file is less than a Kb in size.
Comment by jiyunatori (jiyunatori) -
Monday, 04 August 2008, 20:03 GMT
I agree it's not even remotely a problem - nothing to discuss about, really. I was just pointing out something that appeared to me as a small inconsistency that would take a few minutes to fix. I would have contacted the maintainer directly if I had the possibility, rather than making all this useless noise.
Comment by Greg (dolby) -
Monday, 02 February 2009, 01:27 GMT
@Snowman: care to assign this to Ronald van Haren? AFAI can see its still the same