Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#11077 - Firefox: Could we please stick with the name firefox instead the codenames?
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Marcel (ferkulat) - Thursday, 31 July 2008, 14:56 GMT
Last edited by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 31 July 2008, 16:07 GMT
Opened by Marcel (ferkulat) - Thursday, 31 July 2008, 14:56 GMT
Last edited by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 31 July 2008, 16:07 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
In FVWM I define Styles acording to the class name of the window. Every time firefox version has a new codename it messes up my Style definitions. And it confuses me with the windowlist also. And I am forced to edit my style definitions. For me it is still "firefox" and i am not interested in the name game of the firefox developers. Is that possible? thank you ferkulat |
This task depends upon
Closed by Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Thursday, 31 July 2008, 16:07 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: Short answer: No
Long answer: recompile with branding, or use something like firebrand.
This is a licensing issue. See comments
Thursday, 31 July 2008, 16:07 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Additional comments about closing: Short answer: No
Long answer: recompile with branding, or use something like firebrand.
This is a licensing issue. See comments
Comment by Erwin Van de Velde (evdvelde) -
Thursday, 31 July 2008, 15:15 GMT
This is an issue because of the patches added by Arch. If you add patches to firefox, you have to use the code name (licence issue). But if I look at the patches, they seem not important, thus perhaps they can be dropped?