Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#11050 - The 'learn more' tab on main page is out-of-date

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Jules (Misfit138) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 15:09 GMT
Last edited by Dusty Phillips (Dusty) - Friday, 05 December 2008, 01:00 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Web Sites
Status Closed
Assigned To Dusty Phillips (Dusty)
Simo Leone (neotuli)
Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Dan McGee (toofishes)
Thayer Williams (thayer)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version None
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 3
Private No

Details

Description: http://www.archlinux.org/about/
Quite out-of-date; still talks about [i]current[/i] and [i]release[/i], etc.

Here is an updated version:

About Arch Linux

Arch Linux is an independently developed, i686/x86-64 general purpose GNU/Linux distribution versatile enough to be molded to fit any role. Development focuses on simplicity, minimalism, modernity and code elegance. Arch is installed as a minimal base system, configured by the user and upon which their own ideal environment is assembled by installing only exactly what is required or desired for their own unique purposes. GUI configuration utilities are not provided, as system configuration is performed from the shell by editing simple text files. Arch strives to stay fairly bleeding edge, and typically offers the latest stable versions of software.

Arch Linux uses its own Pacman package manager, which couples a simple binary package format with an easy-to-use package build system, allowing users to easily manage and customize their packages, whether they be official Arch software, or the user's own custom built packages from 3rd party sources. The repository system also allows users to build and maintain their own custom build scripts, packages, and repositories, which encourages community growth and contribution.

The minimal Arch base system package set resides in the streamlined [core] repo. In addition, there exist the official [extra], [community], and [testing] repos, providing many thousands of high-quality, vanilla packages to meet your software demands. Arch also offers an [unsupported] branch in the Arch User Repository, which contains over 9,000 build scripts, for compiling from sources and subsequently easily creating installable packages with the Arch Build System's makepkg tool.

Arch Linux uses a "rolling release" system which allows one-time installation and perpetual software upgrades. Neither reinstallation nor upgrading from one "version" to the next is ever necessary. By issuing one command, the Arch system is kept up-to-date and on the bleeding edge.

Arch does not patch its software except in very rare cases and only to avoid severe breakage due to upstream version mismatches which may infrequently occur within the rolling release model.

If you share this vision of what a GNU/Linux distribution should be, then you are welcomed and encouraged to use it freely, get involved, and contribute to the community. Welcome to Arch!


This task depends upon

Closed by  Dusty Phillips (Dusty)
Friday, 05 December 2008, 01:00 GMT
Reason for closing:  Implemented
Additional comments about closing:  Done... I made some extra modifications. Sooner or later memcached will clear and we'll see the real site live.
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 15:14 GMT
I had noticed that too the other day. Thanks for reporting and updating it
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 16:02 GMT
Yeah, I noticed this too. I got an email from Simo a while back.

I'm fine with this text, but I'd still rather write it myself, so let me go through the notes I have, and see if I have anything to add, or any changes.
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 16:21 GMT
Ok, I made some very minor wording changes, so it sounds a tad more like my "voice", and I threw in a few things from the existing page. Can you all look at the attached and let me know what you think?
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 16:21 GMT Comment by Dusty Phillips (Dusty) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 16:31 GMT Comment by Greg (dolby) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 16:41 GMT
Is community considered an official repo?
Comment by Simo Leone (neotuli) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 16:43 GMT
I see some possible wording changes, don't have time to post them right now but will in a bit.
Comment by Jules (Misfit138) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 17:16 GMT
Aaron: Looks great.
Grigorios: [commmunity] is supported by ABS, and is enabled by default in pacman.d/mirrorlist. So I THINK it is official, whereas [unsupported] (which, like [community], also falls under the umbrella of the AUR), is unofficial. Could be wrong, though.
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Tuesday, 29 July 2008, 17:54 GMT
I'm the same as Simo, I printed this out and marked it all up and have to figure out how to make it obvious what I changed and what may need rewording.
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Wednesday, 30 July 2008, 00:27 GMT
All commented, see attached file. I was fairly verbose and critical because you asked for it- don't take it harsher than necessary.
Comment by Thayer Williams (thayer) - Wednesday, 30 July 2008, 04:04 GMT
Okay, I think I'm up-to-date now, having read Dan's proposed changes. There are a few suggestions of my own, regarding placements of commas, etc...the flow should be smooth when spoken and there are a few places where one still gets tongue-tied.

Overall though, I think it's good. It's funny because my wife and I had been working on a new "Welcome to Arch" blurb in anticipation of a redesign.
Comment by Thayer Williams (thayer) - Wednesday, 30 July 2008, 04:07 GMT
Meant to add that it may be more suitable to add this draft to the DeveloperWiki, making revision control a bit easier.
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 20 November 2008, 20:39 GMT
Just pinging this item here. Is the text good enough in everyone's opinion?
Comment by Dusty Phillips (Dusty) - Sunday, 30 November 2008, 02:01 GMT
It works for me, shall I update?
Comment by Jules (Misfit138) - Tuesday, 02 December 2008, 02:23 GMT
Yes.
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Tuesday, 02 December 2008, 03:14 GMT
Text is fine by me.
Comment by Dusty Phillips (Dusty) - Friday, 05 December 2008, 00:31 GMT
I'm updating it now.

Loading...