Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#10837 - perl-bit-vector 6.4-3 no description
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Imanol Celaya (ornitorrincos) - Sunday, 06 July 2008, 16:34 GMT
Last edited by Xavier (shining) - Monday, 25 May 2009, 11:35 GMT
Opened by Imanol Celaya (ornitorrincos) - Sunday, 06 July 2008, 16:34 GMT
Last edited by Xavier (shining) - Monday, 25 May 2009, 11:35 GMT
|
DetailsDescription:
the package perl-bit-vector doesn't have a description Additional info: * happens on 6.4-3 Steps to reproduce: pacman -Ss perl-bit-vector pacman -Qi perl-bit... search on archlinux..., as you want :) |
This task depends upon
Closed by Xavier (shining)
Monday, 25 May 2009, 11:35 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in git by Dan, commit eb1775e485f732
Monday, 25 May 2009, 11:35 GMT
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: fixed in git by Dan, commit eb1775e485f732
It just contains some additional "'s.
I dont know if this could be regarded as a pacman issue as well.
Redshift can you maybe add toofishes here too?
URL should probably be http://search.cpan.org/~stbey/Bit-Vector-6.4/ or similar.
==> Adding package '/home/makepkg/packages/perl-bit-vector-6.4-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz'
/usr/bin/repo-add: line 156: int math library: command not found
-> Creating 'desc' db entry...
-> Computing md5 checksums...
-> Creating 'depends' db entry...
==> Creating updated database file '/home/dmcgee/projects/arch-repos/perl-bit-vector/trunk/test.db.tar.gz'
Notice the error. Looks like we just have a quoting issue, I'll see what I can do to remedy this.