Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues
This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
FS#10799 - Haunted pacscan, find install leftovers
Attached to Project:
Pacman
Opened by Ben Dibbens (ibendiben) - Tuesday, 01 July 2008, 10:19 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 09 August 2008, 15:44 GMT
Opened by Ben Dibbens (ibendiben) - Tuesday, 01 July 2008, 10:19 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Saturday, 09 August 2008, 15:44 GMT
|
DetailsHave a look at these topics:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=7721 http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=34180 http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=43548 http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=45939 http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=10878 http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=7720 pacscan (proposition by phrakture junior) now four years later: V * Display all installed packages V * Display installed packages in a tree format (dependancy based) V * Display all installed files (basically a -Ql on all installed packages) V? * Check for missing files (similar to above except tests for file) X * Check for unowned files (similar to skeeterbug's script in another thread, but done in C/C++ and optimized to work on a cached pacman database listing) Phrakture you promised! Finish the ultimate task... or it will haunt you forever :p |
This task depends upon
Closed by Allan McRae (Allan)
Saturday, 09 August 2008, 15:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: See comment below
Saturday, 09 August 2008, 15:44 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: See comment below
"pacman -Q"
* Display installed packages in a tree format (dependancy based)
These scripts should provide a starting point:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=10283 (by skoal)
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=10339 (by Spider.007)
* Display all installed files (basically a -Ql on all installed packages)
"pacman -Ql" does this.
* Check for missing files
* Check for unowned files
These scripts should provide a start:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=45939 (by Spider.007)
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=43548
So it should be:
V * Display all installed packages
X * Display installed packages in a tree format (dependancy based)
V * Display all installed files (basically a -Ql on all installed packages)
V? * Check for missing files (similar to above except tests for file)
X * Check for unowned files (similar to skeeterbug's script in another thread, but done in C/C++ and optimized to work on a cached pacman database listing)
Now I know people have been trying to make tools for this... Me too: Ben Dibbens = ibendiben... I know of all the options, I just thought it would be nice if sometime these features were a part of pacman...
As you can see in the topics, the demand is there...
But Allan made a better sumup of the situation imo. We have scripts for getting tree format, and scripts for checking missing/unowned files.
So the goal here is to come up with two perfect scripts, based on these existing ones, and submit them to pacman-dev ML so that they can be included in either pacman or pacman-contrib packages.
It goes without saying that help is welcome :)