Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#1077 - perl modules packages' names do not follow a common scheme
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Brice Carpentier (brice) - Tuesday, 06 July 2004, 20:53 GMT
Last edited by Damir Perisa (damir.perisa) - Wednesday, 23 February 2005, 20:32 GMT
Opened by Brice Carpentier (brice) - Tuesday, 06 July 2004, 20:53 GMT
Last edited by Damir Perisa (damir.perisa) - Wednesday, 23 February 2005, 20:32 GMT
|
Detailsexample :
perlxml libwww-perl htmlparser perl-gtk perl-gtk2 sdl_perl timedate Notice that the packages' names are often not even the modules' names. I think what could be interesting would be to make the perl module package naming a little more uniform. I'm personnally naming my perl module packages perl-something. Example : perl-xml-twig perl-xml-write perl-date-manip perl-html-tree and so on. Comments welcome ;) |
This task depends upon
Closed by arjan timmerman (blaasvis)
Wednesday, 27 July 2005, 09:23 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Wednesday, 27 July 2005, 09:23 GMT
Reason for closing: Implemented
Just my 2ยข
i have only 2 perl things:
dailystrips
bioperl
both are very standalone and i don't think, renaming them would help ... they are more apps than modules (bioperl is lots of modules, but it is a big pkg known everywhere by "bioperl" and not perl-bio or perl-bioperl)
thoughts?