Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#10755 - Slovak localisation of abiword - wrong encoding

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Marian Tomko (macros78) - Wednesday, 25 June 2008, 12:35 GMT
Last edited by Greg (dolby) - Monday, 07 July 2008, 19:38 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2007.08-2
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description: Slovak (sk_SK) localisation of abiword package is in wrong encoding. Should be iso8859-2 and is CP1250. When you run abiword in slovak language there are strange symbols in menus. Abiword stores localized messages in /usr/share/abiword-2.6/strings/


Additional info:
* package version(s) - 2.6.3-1


Steps to reproduce: Run abiword in slovak language.

Attached file is in iso8859-2 encoding and is working.
   sk-SK.strings (88.2 KiB)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Greg (dolby)
Monday, 07 July 2008, 19:38 GMT
Reason for closing:  Upstream
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Wednesday, 25 June 2008, 12:58 GMT
Please file a bug report upstream.This is an abiword bug not an Archlinux one. Post the link here afterwards.
Comment by Marian Tomko (macros78) - Wednesday, 25 June 2008, 13:48 GMT
Well the bug was already reported but for windows platform. Almost same symptoms, but same solution. Link is here: <a href="http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11610">http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11610</a>
Comment by Marian Tomko (macros78) - Wednesday, 25 June 2008, 13:51 GMT
Sorry for the link. For better readability once again: http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11610
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 26 June 2008, 17:51 GMT
As with most things like this - we're going to have to wait for upstream to release a fixed version - I don't like rebuilding a package with a patch that's already been applied upstream and making users download it again for little gain.

This is one of those cases where using ABS is preferred.
Comment by Marian Tomko (macros78) - Thursday, 26 June 2008, 19:43 GMT
The bug is there since 2.6.3 was released and almost no one has complained. I don't see it as a big problem. And if, everyone can simply overwrite one file...

Loading...