Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#10648 - valgrind in core -> add conflict with glibc versions newer than stable

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Raul Silva (raul_nds) - Thursday, 12 June 2008, 17:45 GMT
Last edited by Greg (dolby) - Saturday, 14 June 2008, 06:35 GMT
Task Type Support Request
Category Packages: Core
Status Closed
Assigned To Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Architecture i686
Severity Medium
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2007.08-2
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
valgrind 3.3.0 currently doesn't support glibc 2.8, but 3.3.1 will, says the valgrind developers. The thing is glibc 2.8 is already in testing, so when you run valgrind, it will spit a bunch of non-existing errors (non-existing on your program at least).

Bug report here http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163852

I think this already happened when glibc 2.6 was released, at least from what I saw in the forums. (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=36309)

To solve this I think that when upgrading glibc for those who have testing enable, a conflict should prevent glibc from being upgraded, because valgrind doesn't support it. This way:

1. Who really uses valgrind, my guess is, won't upgrade glibc until valgrind is updated
2. Those who don't use valgrind will remove it temporarily, so they can upgrade glibc.

Remember, these are only suggestions :)

Cheers

Raul



Steps to reproduce:
just run any program (hello world .e.g) with valgrind, and errors will come up
This task depends upon

Closed by  Greg (dolby)
Saturday, 14 June 2008, 06:35 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Comment by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Saturday, 14 June 2008, 04:05 GMT
valgrind has been updated to 3.3.1 so I guess this bug can be closed.

Loading...