Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
FS#10350 - gpm upgrade on arch64 from version 1.20.1-7 to 1.20.3-1
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Niel Drummond (cyanescent) - Saturday, 03 May 2008, 18:08 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Saturday, 03 May 2008, 23:28 GMT
Opened by Niel Drummond (cyanescent) - Saturday, 03 May 2008, 18:08 GMT
Last edited by Jan de Groot (JGC) - Saturday, 03 May 2008, 23:28 GMT
|
DetailsDescription: I've tried to upgrade gpm from version 1.20.1-7 to version 1.20.3-1 on arch64 but pacman bawks with a file conflict
=== gpm: /usr/lib/libgpm.so.1 exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. === 'pacman -Qo' reports the file is not owned by anyone, and 'pacman -Ql' confirms this. strange, as the libgpm.so.1 is only a symlink to a file that is actually owned by the package. |
This task depends upon
Closed by Jan de Groot (JGC)
Saturday, 03 May 2008, 23:28 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: Won't fix, or actually can't fix. See the news posting.
Saturday, 03 May 2008, 23:28 GMT
Reason for closing: Won't fix
Additional comments about closing: Won't fix, or actually can't fix. See the news posting.
Please read http://archlinux.org/news/391/ for more information.
Cheers,
Torsten