Pacman

Historical bug tracker for the Pacman package manager.

The pacman bug tracker has moved to gitlab:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/issues

This tracker remains open for interaction with historical bugs during the transition period. Any new bugs reports will be closed without further action.
Tasklist

FS#10329 - makepkg -b is wrong

Attached to Project: Pacman
Opened by Diogo Dutra (dda) - Thursday, 01 May 2008, 11:56 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Thursday, 24 July 2008, 02:33 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Core
Status Closed
Assigned To Dan McGee (toofishes)
Architecture All
Severity High
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2007.08-2
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Description:
makepkg -b dont install builded packages as depencies, it install as explicited packages and it is not good, I make a patch that revolve this problem.

Additional info:
* package version(s) - pacman 3.1.4-1
* config and/or log files etc.


Steps to reproduce:
makepkg -b
pacman -Qd - the dependencies packages dont show
pacman -Qe - the dependencies packages show
   makepkg.patch (1.6 KiB)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Dan McGee (toofishes)
Thursday, 24 July 2008, 02:33 GMT
Reason for closing:  Won't fix
Additional comments about closing:  makepkg -b was removed with commit ae5ef3b90fcad0627d450f0be6ea04dbea2019e2
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Thursday, 01 May 2008, 12:01 GMT
try posting this in the pacman-dev mailing list or at least the pacman section of the bug tracker. not the Archlinux one.
Comment by Xavier (shining) - Friday, 02 May 2008, 08:19 GMT
That's right, for example I look at all pacman bugs and all mails on pacman-dev, but not at all Arch bugs, there are too many :)
Though that time, I found that bug, but I saw the mail on pacman-dev before and the patch was already discussed there :
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-May/011654.html
Comment by Diogo Dutra (dda) - Friday, 02 May 2008, 11:10 GMT
Im sorry guys, as Xavier says this bug is being discussed in this mail http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-May/011654.html

Loading...