Arch Linux

Please read this before reporting a bug:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in the AUR. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#10302 - [live-media] testing version older than extra

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Corrado Primier (bardo) - Sunday, 27 April 2008, 23:58 GMT
Last edited by Eric Belanger (Snowman) - Sunday, 25 May 2008, 03:07 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Packages: Testing
Status Closed
Assigned To Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2007.08-2
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Testing version: 2008.01.04-1
Extra version: 2008.01.19-1
This task depends upon

Closed by  Eric Belanger (Snowman)
Sunday, 25 May 2008, 03:07 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  The packages mentioned here are OK on x86_64. Plus, with the help of the pkg diff list, I cleaned up a bunch of other pkg with similar problem. AFAIK, everything is fixed.
Comment by Corrado Primier (bardo) - Thursday, 22 May 2008, 08:31 GMT
Maybe related to the dbscripts move, but there's three more packages in this situation now. I thought that using this BR makes things simpler, so here's the list:

warning: doxygen: local (1.5.5-1) is newer than testing (1.5.4-2)
warning: eclipse-cdt: local (4.0.2-1) is newer than testing (4.0.1-1)
warning: gnash-common: local (0.8.2-3) is newer than testing (0.8.2-2)

"local" obviously means "extra" ;-)
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 22 May 2008, 16:35 GMT
Is this i686 only?
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 22 May 2008, 16:38 GMT
I think I cleaned these up, but could not find gnash-common in testing. Someone else may have gotten it.

Can you verify?
Comment by Corrado Primier (bardo) - Thursday, 22 May 2008, 18:28 GMT
It's ok on i686 now, thanks. I have no x86_64 machine to check, but looking at the official repo the problem seem to exist there as well. You're right about gnash-common, though, it's been fixed in the meantime.

Loading...