Please read this before reporting a bug:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reporting_Bug_Guidelines

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.

REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Tasklist

FS#8004 - Nano pkgbuild syntax highlighting

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Joerie de Gram (Thralas) - Wednesday, 12 September 2007, 13:55 GMT-4
Last edited by Andreas Radke (AndyRTR) - Sunday, 30 December 2007, 04:54 GMT-4
Task Type Feature Request
Category Packages: Current
Status Closed
Assigned To Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Operating System All
Severity Very Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 2007.08 Don't Panic
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 1
Private No

Details

The syntax highlighting of nano for pkgbuilds is missing a few makepkg options.

I've attached a patch for /etc/nanorc which adds coloring for arch, options, noextract and the SHA sum options (like md5sums).
   nanorc-highlighting.patch (1.6 KiB)
This task depends upon

Closed by  Andreas Radke (AndyRTR)
Sunday, 30 December 2007, 04:54 GMT-4
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  added nanorc to the backup array. reverted back to the default upstream nanorc.sample.
an updated and fixed pkg is in testing for signoff.
Comment by paul (pwt) - Saturday, 15 September 2007, 18:00 GMT-4
Please don't go further. The nano customization makes it unreadable using terminal emulations with a white background.

Considering this kind of add-ons violate the KISS mantra, I am asking you remove the nanorc customization from the package or include it as a separate file and print the way to install it (optionnaly) during install.

Of course, if you go on, I will continue disabling it with a NoUpgrade option in pacman.conf, but I should not be obliged to do so.

Paul
Comment by Roman Kyrylych (Romashka) - Sunday, 16 September 2007, 05:35 GMT-4
@ Andy: please add etc/nanorc to backup array.
Comment by Anders Bergh (anders) - Friday, 12 October 2007, 15:00 GMT-4
Please don't modify nanorc in this way, it's way too different from the example nanorc and I find it quite annoying. I think the package should simply install the nanorc.example as /etc/nanorc and then add it to the backup array.

Loading...