FS#7111 - Pacman 3 Update

Attached to Project: Pacman
Opened by Greg (dolby) - Thursday, 10 May 2007, 04:36 GMT
Last edited by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Friday, 01 June 2007, 05:42 GMT
Task Type Bug Report
Category Output
Status Closed
Assigned To Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Dan McGee (toofishes)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 3.0.3
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

when i update my system with pacman -Syu i get

warning: audacious-plugins-1.3.4-1: ignoring package upgrade (1.3.4-1)

which seems to me to be the same version, only difference is that the installed one was built by me.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Aaron Griffin (phrakture)
Friday, 01 June 2007, 05:42 GMT
Reason for closing:  Fixed
Additional comments about closing:  Fixed in git version
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 10 May 2007, 17:43 GMT
Hmmm this one is interesting - could you perhaps tar up the following dirs an post it here:
/var/lib/pacman/*/audacious-plugins-1.3.4-1/
(both local and extra, or wherever it's at)

I'm assuming you also have an IgnorePkg entry for this package in pacman.conf?
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Thursday, 10 May 2007, 17:53 GMT
theres also http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=32829 if u havent seeen it already
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Thursday, 10 May 2007, 17:54 GMT
yes i have an ignorepkg entry for it
Comment by Greg (dolby) - Friday, 11 May 2007, 05:40 GMT
since ive been using pacman 3 since when it first got tinto testing i get the idea that this didnt appear in the first versions. i think it started happening with 3.0.2 or 3.0.3. hope that helps
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Friday, 11 May 2007, 17:26 GMT
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=5de03497c3f0379180e5ca62382a00e7b518f2b9

Most likely this patch caused the issue, as IgnorePkg is checked first.

Simple fix (notating for my own record): move the versioncmp before the IgnorePkg check and only output if the result is > 0.
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Friday, 11 May 2007, 18:21 GMT
In any case, its annoying but not critical- just an output thing. I'll let you take care of the fix.
Comment by Xavier (shining) - Sunday, 13 May 2007, 22:17 GMT
oops, my mistake, here is the simple fix.
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Thursday, 31 May 2007, 07:18 GMT
Aaron, status on this one?

Loading...