FS#19077 - [samba] segfault when accessing samba shares with "share" security level
Attached to Project:
Arch Linux
Opened by Benjamin Wild (honki) - Tuesday, 13 April 2010, 13:45 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Saturday, 18 June 2011, 08:34 GMT
Opened by Benjamin Wild (honki) - Tuesday, 13 April 2010, 13:45 GMT
Last edited by Andrea Scarpino (BaSh) - Saturday, 18 June 2011, 08:34 GMT
|
Details
Description:
Upstream bug in samba. If you try to access a samba share when the samba sever security level is set so "share", smbclient will segfault. This bug is related to There's a fix in the current dev version of samba: - https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7250 - http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=34f0cff0664f1c160ee7442461e9f875e8d8f4dc;hp=dc689827114c46b3ca2a75082421dc2d98001ce7 Arch BBS discussion related to this bug: - http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=742669 The patch also fixed the nautilus/dbus problems reported in I attached an updated PKGBUILD which includes the patch mentioned above. |
This task depends upon
severity probably medium or high...
ERROR MSG 1:
"Opening "RINGWRAITH". You can stop this operation by clicking cancel."
ERROR MSG 2:
"Unable to mount location
DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Message did not receive a reply (timeout by message bus)"
After giving up and closing nautilus, if I run 'top' I see that a process called 'gvfsd-smb-brows' is running using 99% of my cpu - and 'nautilus' is still running.
So the fix suggested above by the reporter does not work.
--Theoden
Regarding the gvfsd-smb-brows process: Someone mentioned in the arch bbs discussion thread that killing this process and restarting nautilus fixed the problem, so you could try if that works for you as well...
Anyway - thanks for the input. :)
--Theoden