FS#14697 - [abs] Include PKGBUILD-rubygem.proto

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) - Tuesday, 12 May 2009, 14:28 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Sunday, 14 June 2009, 03:43 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Packages: Extra
Status Closed
Assigned To Allan McRae (Allan)
Architecture All
Severity Very Low
Priority Low
Reported Version
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Please include this prototype PKGBUILD in ABS. I'd like it named PKGBUILD-rubygem rather than -ruby, as Garoth is working on creating a template for building from the gemspec instead of using rubygems.

Thanks.

# Contributor: YourName <YourEmail AT example DOT com>
pkgname=ruby-GEMNAME # All lowercase
pkgver=GEMVERSION
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Ruby gem FooBar which implements BazQuux"
arch=(any)
url=""
license=()
depends=(ruby) # Gem may depend on other gems as well (you can get dependency information from the yaml specification)
makedepends=(rubygems)
source=(http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/GEMNAME-$pkgver.gem)
noextract=(GEMNAME-$pkgver.gem)
md5sums=()

build() {
cd $srcdir
# _gemdir is defined inside build() because if ruby[gems] is not installed on the system
# makepkg will barf when sourcing the PKGBUILD
local _gemdir="$(ruby -rubygems -e'puts Gem.default_dir')"

gem install --ignore-dependencies -i "$pkgdir$_gemdir" GEMNAME-$pkgver.gem
}

# vim:set ts=2 sw=2 et:
This task depends upon

Closed by  Allan McRae (Allan)
Sunday, 14 June 2009, 03:43 GMT
Reason for closing:  Implemented
Additional comments about closing:  Added prototype to git
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 13 May 2009, 14:10 GMT
So, which template will be prefered once the gemspec version is available? I'd prefer to only include the "best" as a prototype.
Comment by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) - Wednesday, 13 May 2009, 14:35 GMT
Fair enough. I think it still makes sense to have the gem version until the gemspec version is available, as that's better than having none at all, but I'm fine with this being deferred until the other template is complete.
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Wednesday, 13 May 2009, 14:39 GMT
Well, it depends how far in the future the gemspec version will be available. I do not foresee an ABS release in the near future...
Comment by Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth) - Wednesday, 13 May 2009, 18:03 GMT
I'm not sure, I'll look into it.
Comment by Allan McRae (Allan) - Sunday, 14 June 2009, 03:42 GMT
In ABS git: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=abs.git;a=commit;h=71cd3c47

Loading...