FS#11325 - {archweb} Web-base signoffs adjustments

Attached to Project: Arch Linux
Opened by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Wednesday, 27 August 2008, 18:20 GMT
Last edited by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Tuesday, 07 February 2012, 00:00 GMT
Task Type Feature Request
Category Dashboard
Status Closed
Assigned To Dusty Phillips (Dusty)
Dan McGee (toofishes)
Architecture All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version 1.0
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Firstly, could we get a link to the signoff page from the main dashboard?

Secondly, a few recommendations for the display:
* We don't need the maintainer column
* Would it be possible to list the repo that the *other* package is in and give us the ability to filter by that. Take for instance, man-pages. The listing should show "core" as the "Target Repo" that it will be moved to. This will give us the ability to make a run-through of core packages much easier.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Dan McGee (toofishes)
Tuesday, 07 February 2012, 00:00 GMT
Reason for closing:  Implemented
Additional comments about closing:  Open additional focused bug reports for any more issues
Comment by Dusty Phillips (Dusty) - Tuesday, 14 April 2009, 02:17 GMT
I've dropped the maintainer column and added the target repo column. In some cases target repo can't be determined, possibly because it is a brand new package with no counterpart in core/extra, in which case, (unknown) is displayed.

I don't understand what you mean by wanting a link on the dashboard page -- there's a link in the top menu, do you want something more in the dashboard?
Comment by Paul Mattal (paul) - Thursday, 24 September 2009, 11:28 GMT
This has been open a long time. Aaron, can you clarify for us, or are you satisfied with the fix Dusty made?
Comment by Aaron Griffin (phrakture) - Thursday, 24 September 2009, 18:52 GMT
I guess it's OK. All things considered, people don't like the web-based signoffs, and prefer email. So this may be a lost cause
Comment by Dan McGee (toofishes) - Sunday, 19 June 2011, 20:41 GMT
Please at least comment first before you go closing bugs assigned to me. If I didn't have intentions of doing something here, I wouldn't have left this open.
Comment by Thomas Bächler (brain0) - Monday, 06 February 2012, 22:55 GMT
I guess this should be closed now. Dan?

Loading...