FS#10902 - Proposed rename of "lzma" to "lzma-utils"
Attached to Project:
Community Packages
Opened by dcecchin (Kalidarn) - Sunday, 13 July 2008, 10:37 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Monday, 14 July 2008, 02:11 GMT
Opened by dcecchin (Kalidarn) - Sunday, 13 July 2008, 10:37 GMT
Last edited by Allan McRae (Allan) - Monday, 14 July 2008, 02:11 GMT
|
Details
I decided to modify the UPX PKGBUILD
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1625
to have LZMA support.
What I discovered is we have a package called "lzma" http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5818 located at: http://tukaani.org/lzma/ In Gentoo, this is called "lzma-utils" http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-arch/lzma-utils which makes far more sense and won't get confused with the lzma-sdk. A lot of distributors are calling it "lzma" which is bad because there's another project http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-arch/lzma which is the lzma-sdk from http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html (We don't currently have a lzma-sdk package I was going to create one). It was only in the UPX readme when it said this, export UPX_LZMADIR=$HOME/local/src/lzma-4.43 and there is no 4.43 version of our "lzma" package I discovered that they are actually talking about the SDK, and as it happens the gentoo UPX package is also depending on that very same "lzma-sdk" except for the fact they call it just lzma. To make matters worse there is a lzma-4.999.3alpha.tar.gz and lzma-4.42.2alpha.tar.gz alpha @ http://tukaani.org/lzma but I found it highly unlikely UPX would be depending on those, as UPX hasn't had an update in quite some time. I'm proposing that we rename "lzma" to "lzma-utils" and have a "lzma-sdk" package. |
This task depends upon
Comment by
Francois Charette (Firmicus) -
Sunday, 13 July 2008, 12:44 GMT
Makes sense. I'll rename it asap.